2. Name it 'Barack Obama'.
3. Send it to theRecycle Bin.
4. Empty the Recycle Bin.
5. Your PC will ask you:
'Do you really want to get rid of 'Barack Obama?'
6. Firmly Click 'Yes.'
Feel better?
GOOD!
Tomorrow we'll do Nancy Pelosi!
I know the next part is long, but please read completely. This issue ruins and recklessly endangers tens of thousands of family and and childrens lives each day, and cost tax payers billions nationwide!
On Monday, July 26, 2010 at 7:25 am, Fox News aired an interview (or debate) between Mr.
If you missed the interview, you can find it here: http://video.foxnews.com/#/v/4293600/georgia-eases-sex-offender-restrictions/?playlist_id=87937 it was titled “
Now I personally love Fox News, and generally find them to be truly fair and balanced, at least compared to other network news and CNN. However in this case they missed the boat. They failed to point out how the GA politicians chose to stand as strong as possible and as strict as the COURTS WOULD ALLOW them on maintaining and restricting those on the registry. See, we have this little thing called The Constitution that keeps getting in the way, Just Damn! They were forced to accept the lesser of two evils lest GA wind up like
Mr. Piercy did an amazing job considering the format. Fox of course disclosed Kelly's crime for possession of pornography, conviction etc. I was curious why they failed to point out Mr. Lunsford's history with porn, since on the morning of his daughter's abduction, perhaps while she was being abducted, police found in the delete bin of his computer that he had been viewing pornography. He had not deleted a number of bookmarks however. Since he had not down loaded or saved any, and perhaps because of the drama he was experiencing at the time regarding his daughter, his attorneys were rightfully able to get any charges dropped for Mr. Lunsford. Kudos to Mr. Piercy for NOT pointing this out and taking the high road!
Next, Mr. Lunsford suggested that no one should be removed from the registry because their crime may have been pleaded down to a lower level. Again curious since almost two years after Mark Lunsford's nationwide campaign to significantly increase the sentences and release conditions for sex offenses, Jessica Lunsford's older brother, Joshua Lunsford, was charged in Clark County District Court with "unlawful sexual conduct with a minor”. The incident involves a 14-year-old girl outside of the Upper Valley Mall in
Mr. Lunsford also suggests that rehabilitation for sex offenders was not possible. And I quote:”Once you’re convicted, you’re never going to be reformed. Never in the history of mankind has anyone been reformed” This is of course patently false. Huge volumes of research and studies bear this out. In fact, even the Department of Justice was forced to reveal that in there study to prove high recidivism amongst sex offenders, the facts proved sex offenders had the lowest recidivism rate, less than 13% over three years, among all convicted felons except murderers. Drug dealers, gang bangers, armed robbers, home burglars, etc. all over were over 40%. And considering the length of sentences murders get, that is impressive. Research, facts and logic be damned, why should he do any research and educate himself when emotions can rule the day. Again Mr. Piercy took the high road and did not ask Mr. Lunsford if this meant that he was still looking at porn on his computer or if his son was still having sexual relations with 14 yr. olds.
My point is this, just like the politicians who are pandering to the hysterical and misinformed public to pass unconstitutional and immoral laws to get elected, there are those who seek to profit and gain media attention through emotions rather than logic, facts and reason. Mr. Lunsford and Mr. Walsh have both profited greatly, and gained notoriety through the exploitation of their daughters tragic misfortunes and deaths. They have done it on the backs of thousands who have paid their debt, and the hundreds of thousands family members, children and friends of those on the registry. They have done this with complete disregard of the facts, unimpeachable research and studies, logic or reason. They have completely ignored the fact that it has been proven these laws actually create a greater risk to everyone else's children. I personally find this disgusting and disturbing, especially since people such as Mr. Piercy continue to take the high road in spite of the personal attacks and injustices played upon them. Who is the real villain here?
While the desire and goal to save even one child from harm is most laudable, to do so by recklessly endangering the safety and lives of thousands of children, families, friends, fellow neighbors and co-workers does not seem a viable, or reasonable solution...at least not to me. Just Damn!
In full disclosure, I know Mr.
"Those who are willing to sacrifice freedom for security deserve neither freedom nor security, and will loose both." Benjamin Franklin.
“The state must declare the child to be the most precious treasure of the people. As long as the government is perceived as working for the benefit of the children, the people will happily endure almost any curtailment of liberty and almost any deprivation. ” From “Mein Kampf” by Adolf Hitler
"Now I personally love Fox News, and generally find them to be truly fair and balanced, at least compared to other network news and CNN."
ReplyDeleteAuthor/Editor,
I'm sorry to disagree with you on this. First of all, I'm an RSO, and I'm with you on all of this. Also, for the record, I'm an Independent, and I may lean Tea Party if they actually show that they want to uphold the Constitutional Rights of EVERYONE...and, I mean, EVERYONE.
During its first decade, Fox News, in my opinion, lowered the bar when it came to sex offender coverage. Maybe you weren't watching or paying attention. But, especially between 2000 and 2006, they were the ones sensationalizing all of the child abductions...Elizabeth Smart, Jessica Lunsford, the 2 kids in Idaho who were taken (one of them killed) by a RSO, etc. CNN and the rest simply followed in this race to the bottom. CNN's answer to Fox's S.O. hype was Nancy Grace - the devil incarnate.
I understand and respect that you may consider yourself conservative. Frankly, Republicans and Democrats and just about all politicians are the cause of this S.O. mess we are all in, but, the media are fanning the flames. You may think Fox is fair and balanced, but they are not. And, they never have been. Neither is any other mainstream media outlet....probably not even PBS or NPR (but at least there one doesn't have to hear people yelling over one another).
I appreciate your blog and the fact that folks like you and so many others are out there hitting the bricks and fighting for the rights of RSOs and their families. I'm not out here writing this to contradict anything you're doing...I thank you for it all. I just hate the Fox News Channel, and I think when we look back someday at "who fired first" in the race to the bottom, it will be obvious that they and their pro-Bush and pro-Republican agenda did. And, what a better way to fortify a political agenda than to freak everyone out about the "bogey man" living next door just waiting to pounce on their children. Fox is a fear monger just like the rest, but I think they are the leader of the pack. But, all of this rant is just my opinion. Thank you.
Thank you George for your comments. You are right on many points, and I appreciate your pointing out some of my errors, I feel I actually mis-spoke, or at least did not make myself clear. I do enjoy Fox News, and I should have said BY COMPARISON I feel they are more fair and balanced than the rest of the media, they did hammer Bush and the Republicans regarding spending and bailouts after all, but they of course are no where near close to being truly "Fair and Balanced", at least on most issues. Unfortunately, all sources of news and commentary today are biased in one way or another.
ReplyDeleteAs you can tell by my blog, I hold no politicians in reverence. I am certainly not a Republican or Democrat. If I were forced to label myself in such a way as to enable people to understand me, I guess I would have to call myself a Libertarian. I, however, prefer to consider myself an Original Constitutionalist. I feel every time a law is written, we further diminish our society. We are a nation of laws of course, however every time a law is written, some rights of the people are decimated. And of course, it takes money to enforce these laws. That is how a Democratic Republic works.
Both the media, and the politicians have stooped to a level of using sensationalism and fear mongering to achieve their goals. They have both stopped using research, logic and reason to seek what is the truth and what is right. This is both deplorable and despicable, and it is destroying our once great nation.
George, I do not know how you found my blog, but I am glad you did. Please join and follow and be sure to keep an eye on me. I am flying solo here and can use all the help I can get.-VDog
Thank you very much for understanding my point of view. I will definitely bookmark this blog and read it regularly. I found it via a link from: http://sexoffenderissues.blogspot.com in their posting of a Georgians for Reform Fox Interview.
ReplyDeleteI agree with everything you said above about this being a nation of laws and how this nation is being destroyed by this race to the bottom by politicians.
Thank you, again, for helping to fight the fight.